My Proposal for a NYCTBATSS

Pages: << < (2/5) > >>

GoYankees:

Adobe Reader 9.0

rayv145:

I think we should just stick with the regular BVETSS. If we make things different it would just be confusing

error46146:

the regular BVETSS is for british tracks..our tracks dont have 4 rails lol

besides its not like were gona start using the LT1996 on the E line or anything

GoYankees:

IDK if you need these but w/e

R160 Siemens on Ground level gravel tracks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUUPHs3eE7I&feature=player_embedded
--


R68 on Ground level gravel tracks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGk9im1SAK8&feature=player_embedded
--


R160 alstom on ground level gravel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEHdJxnbjAA&feature=player_embedded
--

qnzshinez777:

i guess if it is for the best, then let it be then. The train developers can finally get a better work of the rails, and everyone else will enjoy it.  :P

Pages: << < (2/5) > >>